Engagements built around the work that happens after launch.
Most websites do not fail at launch — they fail over time, as updates stack up, staff turn over, and integrations drift. FlowMint engagements are structured to prevent that drift.
Three shapes engagements typically take.
These are starting points, not packaged tiers. Most engagements blend elements of more than one.
Website Modernization
A scoped project to refresh, rebuild, or migrate an existing WordPress site — accessibly built, structured to maintain, ready to hand off.
Website Stewardship
An ongoing monthly engagement covering updates, accessibility maintenance, integration health, content support, monthly check-ins, and structured reporting.
Structured Site Review
A 30-day comprehensive review of your existing site, producing a prioritized working document to guide your next year of web decisions.
Ongoing care for a site you intend to keep.
An annual stewardship engagement is a monthly retainer with a defined hours envelope and project allocation, structured to keep your WordPress site healthy, accessible, and aligned with your organizational priorities throughout the year.
Updates & testing
WordPress core, plugin, and theme updates tested in staging before deployment to production.
Accessibility maintenance
WCAG 2.2 AA reviewed at each significant change, with remediation as needed.
Integration health
Monitoring and remediation across your CRM, email marketing, donation platform, and analytics integrations.
Content support
Time allocated each month for content updates, new pages, campaign support, and small structural improvements.
Monthly check-ins & reporting
A standing monthly review covering updates applied, issues caught, time used, and what's next.
Performance & security monitoring
Uptime tracking, Core Web Vitals monitoring, security observation, and broken link detection — caught before they affect your audience.
Stewardship engagements are scoped to your organization's actual needs — typical monthly hours, response practices, and project allocation are defined collaboratively during the scoping conversation.
Refresh, rebuild, or migrate — built to be maintainable from day one.
A modernization engagement produces a current, accessible, well-structured WordPress site that your team can operate confidently. Most modernization engagements transition into ongoing stewardship at launch.
Site review & working plan
Begins with a comprehensive review of your current site, producing a prioritized plan for the modernization scope.
Information architecture
Navigation structure, page hierarchy, and content organization built around how your audience and staff actually use the site.
Accessible design implementation
WCAG 2.2 AA built in from the structural foundation, not retrofitted after.
Content systems
Reusable page templates, structured content models, and editorial workflows your staff can operate without developer help.
Form workflows & integrations
Accessible inquiry, donation, and event forms wired into the CRM, email, and analytics systems your organization uses.
Handoff & documentation
At launch, your team receives a written reference covering site structure, editorial workflows, integration configuration, and ongoing maintenance considerations.
A 30-day comprehensive review producing a prioritized working document.
A standalone engagement for organizations evaluating their current website — what's working, what isn't, and where to invest. The deliverable is a working document your team can use directly, with or without continuing the engagement.
Comprehensive site review
A structured pass through the site covering structure, content, accessibility, performance, integrations, and SEO.
Prioritized working document
Findings organized by priority and impact, written in plain language for the people on your team who'll act on them.
Accessibility audit
WCAG 2.2 AA conformance check across representative pages, with specific findings and recommended remediation.
Performance baseline
Current Core Web Vitals and page-speed measurements, with recommendations for sustainable improvement.
Integration health check
Review of how your third-party integrations are configured and whether they're behaving as expected.
Recommendations memo
A final memo summarizing what we found, what we'd recommend, and what a next-year working plan could look like — whether or not you continue with us.
Structured Site Reviews are commonly used at the start of a Stewardship engagement to establish a year-one working plan, but they're also valuable as standalone engagements when an organization is evaluating its current site or comparing vendors.
Competencies present in every engagement.
These are the practice areas that show up across both modernization and stewardship work.
Accessible Implementation
WCAG 2.2 AA reviewed at design, build, and each significant content change. Semantic structure, keyboard navigation, screen-reader testing, and remediation as needed.
Inquiry & Response Systems
Accessible forms, structured intake, notification routing, and integration with the CRM, email, and donation platforms your team already uses. Includes optional automated response systems for high-volume inquiry workflows.
Content Systems & Editorial Workflows
Reusable page templates, structured content models, plain-language guidance so your staff can update the site without breaking the design. Built around how your team actually works.
Integration Health
Ongoing monitoring of the third-party services your site depends on — MailChimp, Constant Contact, Salesforce, HubSpot, GiveButter, Bloomerang, GA4 — caught and addressed before they break.
SEO & Performance Maintenance
On-page SEO maintenance, Core Web Vitals monitoring, search performance reporting — kept up over time, not optimized once and forgotten.
Questions we hear at the scoping stage.
Each engagement is scoped to your organization's actual needs — site complexity, integration footprint, content velocity, and accessibility requirements all factor in. Most stewardship engagements run as annual retainers with a defined monthly hours envelope and project allocation. We'll discuss specifics during the scoping conversation.
Most of our work is structured for ongoing engagement, because that's where the value compounds. We also take on standalone Structured Site Reviews and Modernization projects, and we're happy to discuss what fits your situation.
Each engagement has a defined scope and hours envelope. If priorities shift or scope grows beyond what's covered, we discuss it openly — usually leading to a scope adjustment or a project allocation from the engagement's monthly hours.
The CRM, email marketing, donation, event, and analytics platforms mission-driven organizations actually use — including MailChimp, Constant Contact, Salesforce, HubSpot, GiveButter, Bloomerang, DonorPerfect, Eventbrite, Google Analytics 4, and others. If you have an integration we haven't worked with, we'll learn it as part of the engagement.
Large enterprise agency capacity, high-volume e-commerce platforms, paid advertising management, content writing as a primary service, and platforms other than WordPress. We focus deliberately on what we do well.
With an introductory conversation — typically 20 to 30 minutes — to understand where your site is now and what would help. If there's mutual fit, we propose a scoping conversation, and from there we structure an engagement together.
Tell us about your site.
The first conversation is short, low-pressure, and focused on understanding your situation — not selling you on ours.